Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kaia Kanepi vs Isis Louise Van Den Broek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kanepi vs Broek analysis and find out who is favored!
Kaia Kanepi vs Isis Louise Van Den Broek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kanepi 1 - 0 Broek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kanepi has won 28.81% of points on their second serve, while Broek has won 45.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kanepi, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Broek has won 50.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.54% and 44.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kanepi has saved 37.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broek has saved 53.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kanepi has won 50% of matches played (W/L 11/ 11), with Broek winning 65.63% (W/L 21/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kanepi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 102/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 49% (W/L 26/ 27). Broek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 17/ 6), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kanepi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5), where as Broek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 16/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kanepi winning 1 times and Broek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kanepi winning 2 and Broek winning 0. The last match between Kanepi and Broek was at the W60 Amstelveen, 13-07-2023, Second, Clay with Kaia Kanepi getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kanepi and Broek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kanepi winning 0 times and Broek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kanepi winning 0, and Broek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kanepi has played against opponents with an average rank of 162.27 while Broek has played against players with an average rank of 264.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kanepi has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broek has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kanepi has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broek has converted 55.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
276
Rank
15
High
39
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
703
Rank
703
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
62% (555-347)
Career Total W/L
66% (21-11)
0% (0-3)
YTD W/L
56% (5-4)
$5,914,332
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kaia Kanepi | Isis Louise Van Den Broek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (32/48) | 71% (46/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (27/32) | 54% (25/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 42% (8/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (32/65) | 25% (12/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Kaia Kanepi
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kaia Kanepi | Isis Louise Van Den Broek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/6) | 55% (12/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 28% (14/36) | 50% (105/107) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:40 | 1:59:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 114.67 | 280.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (118/177) | 67% (505/756) |
| 1st Serve W% | 46% (54/118) | 57% (286/505) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 29% (17/59) | 46% (115/251) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (7/15) | 55% (41/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (66/160) | 46% (297/640) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 56% (5/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Kaia Kanepi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Kaia Kanepi
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Kaia Kanepi
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Kaia Kanepi
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Kaia Kanepi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Kaia Kanepi
74%
(
79 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
9 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
112
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(7) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Kaia Kanepi
46%
(
36 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
9
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
9
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaia Kanepi
Player
Barbora Strycova
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Kaia Kanepi
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alize Cornet
Player
Kaia Kanepi
67%
(
82 of
122)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
117)
2
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
0
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
30%
(
12 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
46%
(
56 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(1) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Isis Louise Van Den Broek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Maria Andrienko
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Laia Petretic
65%
(
81 of
124)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
57 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Maria Oliver Sanchez
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Jane Dunyon
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Annelin Bakker
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
70 of
96)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kanepi Vs Broek Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kanepi are available here and Broek photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
